A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL FOR EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF ONLINE CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT IN PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55956/UHGS3870Keywords:
online citizen engagement , digital public governance, public sector efficiency, transaction costs, institutional adaptation, public value, e-participation, conceptual modelAbstract
The article examines theoretical approaches to evaluating online citizen engagement within the system of public governance. Based on a systematic review of academic publications, the fragmentation of existing evaluation models of digital participation is identified. Key groups of indicators characterizing technical, organizational, and societal dimensions of efficiency are determined. It is established that the reduction of transaction costs in digital interaction creates conditions for improving administrative performance and generating public value. A multidimensional conceptual model integrating technological, institutional, and socio-economic parameters of online citizen engagement evaluation is developed. The proposed structure enables digital participation mechanisms to be interpreted as instruments for enhancing the economic and institutional efficiency of the public sector and may serve as a basis for further operationalization of indicators and empirical verification.
References
1. OECD. The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six Dimensions of a Digital Government. – Paris : OECD Publishing, 2020. – 44 p.
2. Stiglitz J. E. Economics of the Public Sector. – 4th ed. – New York : W.W. Norton & Company, 2015. – 896 p.
3. Mazzucato M. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. – London : Allen Lane, 2018. – 384 p.
4. World Bank. GovTech Maturity Index: The State of Public Sector Digital Transformation. – Washington, DC : World Bank, 2021. – 98 p.
5. Mariani I., Mortati M., Rizzo F., Deserti A. An overview on e-participation // SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. – Cham : Springer, 2024. – P. 31–56. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-72160-1_3.
6. Page M. J., McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J. M., Akl E. A., Brennan S. E., Chou R., Glanville J., Grimshaw J. M., Hróbjartsson A., Lalu M. M., Li T., Loder E. W., Mayo-Wilson E., McDonald S., McGuinness L. A., Stewart L. A., Thomas J., Tricco A. C., Welch V. A., Whiting P., Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews // BMJ. – 2021. – Vol. 372. – Article n71. – DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7. Aichholzer G., Rose G. Experience with Digital Tools in Different Types of E-Participation // Studies in Digital Politics and Governance. – Cham : Springer, 2022. – P. 93–140. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8_4.
8. Adnan M., Ghazali M., Othman N. Z. S. E-participation within the context of e-government initiatives: A comprehensive systematic review // Telematics and Informatics Reports. – 2022. – Vol. 8. – Article 100015. – DOI: 10.1016/j.teler.2022.100015.
9. Meijer A., Grimmelikhuijsen S. Responsible digital government: Public values and institutional adaptation in the digital age // Government Information Quarterly. – 2023. – Vol. 40, No. 2. – Article 101786. – DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101786.
Downloads
Published online
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Г.Б. Егенбергенова, Г.И. Ешенкулова (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
